Bartlett & Partners logo
Menu iconMenu icon

HOM-B

Darren’s insights

Why It's Time to End Long Sole Agency Contracts in the Property Market

In the picturesque suburbs of Richmond, Twickenham, and Teddington, where historic homes meet leafy avenues, a silent struggle is unfolding. It involves homeowners, estate agents, and a web of contracts that often work against the very people they’re meant to serve. At the heart of this struggle is the long sole agency contract—a tool that has become a mainstay of the property market but often to the detriment of sellers.

HOM-B

Share
The Alluring Promise

Meet Sarah, a homeowner in Richmond who recently decided to sell her charming Victorian home. With dreams of moving closer to her daughter in the countryside, Sarah approached a well-known corporate estate agency. The agent, impeccably dressed and armed with glossy brochures, assured her of a quick sale at a premium price. The catch? She needed to sign a 12-week sole agency contract to get started.

Initially, the offer seemed enticing. The agent painted a picture of eager buyers clamouring for a home like hers, promising an expedited sale at top whack. Seduced by the prospect of a lucrative deal, Sarah signed the contract, believing she was making a sound decision.

The Reality Sets In

Weeks passed, and the promised flood of buyers turned into a trickle. Despite Sarah’s initial optimism, her property sat on the market with little interest. To make matters worse, only a week after marketing her home, the agent began urging her to drop the asking price. This was despite the initial valuation that had promised a higher return.

The inflated valuation, a tactic used by the agency to secure her business, proved to be a barrier rather than a selling point. The asking price was too high, discouraging potential buyers and leaving Sarah’s hopes dashed.

With no ability to switch agents or seek alternative strategies, Sarah was trapped. The lengthy contract meant she had to endure the waiting game, her plans on hold while her property languished in limbo. Her frustration grew as she realised she was just another client in a corporate system more interested in maintaining control than delivering results.

A Common Tale

Sarah's story is far from unique in these affluent suburbs. Across Richmond, Twickenham, and Teddington, homeowners find themselves locked into similar agreements. Large corporate agencies dominate the market, leveraging their reputations to draw in clients but often falling short of their promises. These agencies use long sole agency contracts to ensure exclusivity, reducing their motivation to provide the exceptional service they boast about.

The lack of flexibility inherent in these contracts often leaves sellers feeling powerless and frustrated. Homeowners watch as their dreams of selling and moving forward are delayed by a process designed to protect the agency’s interests rather than their own.

The Call for Change

Imagine a property market free from the constraints of long sole agency contracts. The benefits would be transformative:

  • Realistic Pricing: Without the need to secure clients with unrealistic valuations, agents would be more likely to provide honest and accurate pricing, leading to more successful sales.
  • Improved Service: With the possibility of competition, estate agents would be incentivised to provide superior service, focusing on the needs and satisfaction of the homeowner rather than simply securing a contract.
  • Greater Transparency: Eliminating lengthy sole agency agreements would foster a culture of transparency and honesty. Homeowners would feel more empowered and informed about the selling process.
  • Increased Market Efficiency: A more open market encourages fair competition, resulting in a more efficient property sector where homes are bought and sold based on true value and merit.

Empowering Homeowners

For homeowners like Sarah, the journey to reclaiming power begins with awareness and strategy:

  • Negotiate Terms: If a sole agency agreement is unavoidable, negotiate the shortest possible term. A four to six-week contract provides more flexibility and keeps the agent motivated.
  • Do Your Research: Don’t settle for the first agent you meet. Interview multiple agents, compare their valuations, and ask about their marketing strategies and track record.
  • Read the Fine Print: Always read contracts thoroughly and understand all terms and conditions. Seek legal advice if necessary to ensure you’re not inadvertently locking yourself into an unfavourable deal.
  • Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off about an agent's valuation or promises, trust your instincts. Your property is one of your most valuable assets, and you deserve an agent who respects and prioritises your interests.

Conclusion

As we see in Sarah’s case, the property market is in dire need of reform. By challenging the status quo and refusing to be bound by long sole agency contracts, homeowners can demand better service, fair pricing, and a more transparent market.

Let us learn from these stories and push for a property market that truly serves the interests of its participants. It’s time to break free from outdated practices and embrace a future where homeowners are empowered to make the best decisions for themselves and their families.

HOM-F

Related Insight

Jul 2024

This is a link to a Blog post

Darren’s insights

The Pulse of the Property Market: Rightmove's Latest Update

Jun 2024

This is a link to a Blog post

Local

House Price Index: your latest guide to the Richmond property market

Jun 2024

This is a link to a Blog post

Darren’s insights

General Election Spotlight 2024: Key Housing Market Reforms